Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery...
Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
