Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Amendment to Section 281 removed the requirement to prove...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereafter.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Amendment to Section 281 removed the requirement to prove transfers were made with intent to defraud, so revenue need not establish fraudulent intent; consequence: Section 281(1) applied until service of the Rule 2 notice on 26.02.2016. Under the Second Schedule, the relevant date for attachment is service of the notice and Rule 16(2) renders transfers of attached property void only as against claims enforceable under the attachment, not void ab initio; consequence: a mortgage after service may be ineffective against revenue claims but can still be enforced against any surplus. The TRO lacked jurisdiction to declare the mortgage void ab initio; consequence: that declaration was set aside, TRO may sell and appropriate proceeds, and any surplus is payable after finality of related proceedings.
Amendment to Section 281 removed the requirement to prove transfers were made with intent to defraud, so revenue need not establish fraudulent intent; consequence: Section 281(1) applied until service of the Rule 2 notice on 26.02.2016. Under the Second Schedule, the relevant date for attachment is service of the notice and Rule 16(2) renders transfers of attached property void only as against claims enforceable under the attachment, not void ab initio; consequence: a mortgage after service may be ineffective against revenue claims but can still be enforced against any surplus. The TRO lacked jurisdiction to declare the mortgage void ab initio; consequence: that declaration was set aside, TRO may sell and appropriate proceeds, and any surplus is payable after finality of related proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
