Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Final assessment order issued under the relevant incometax provisions without incorporating Dispute Resolution Panel directions is invalid because the transfer pricing officer has not passed any order implementing those directions; therefore the assessing officer's final order is null and void. The Tribunal held that it cannot set aside the assessment to allow the TPO to pass a future order or extend time for that purpose; consequence: assessment quashed and decision in favour of the taxpayer. Prior precedents cited include decisions recognising the requirement to incorporate DRP directions before a valid final assessment is framed.
Final assessment order issued under the relevant incometax provisions without incorporating Dispute Resolution Panel directions is invalid because the transfer pricing officer has not passed any order implementing those directions; therefore the assessing officer's final order is null and void. The Tribunal held that it cannot set aside the assessment to allow the TPO to pass a future order or extend time for that purpose; consequence: assessment quashed and decision in favour of the taxpayer. Prior precedents cited include decisions recognising the requirement to incorporate DRP directions before a valid final assessment is framed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.