Power to receive documentary evidence upheld; documents referred in complaint may be placed on record without amendment where omission was inadvertent...
Proof of foreign public documents requires originals or certified diplomatic/notarial copies; inspection must occur in-magna presence and cross-examin...
Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below thresh...
Eligibility for exemption depends on strict construction of the product description; reapers without binder are ineligible, but confiscation and penal...
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to revive appeal
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 was considered, and the tribunal applied binding precedent to treat limitation as governed by section 153 read with section 144C; consequence: the final assessment order for the stated year was held timebarred and quashed. The tribunal followed prior High Court and ITAT decisions endorsing mutual inclusion of the two provisions and cited a pending Supreme Court reference; consequence: parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal for merits if the higher court's ultimate ruling requires modification of this order.
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 was considered, and the tribunal applied binding precedent to treat limitation as governed by section 153 read with section 144C; consequence: the final assessment order for the stated year was held timebarred and quashed. The tribunal followed prior High Court and ITAT decisions endorsing mutual inclusion of the two provisions and cited a pending Supreme Court reference; consequence: parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal for merits if the higher court's ultimate ruling requires modification of this order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.