Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to revive appeal
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 was considered, and the tribunal applied binding precedent to treat limitation as governed by section 153 read with section 144C; consequence: the final assessment order for the stated year was held timebarred and quashed. The tribunal followed prior High Court and ITAT decisions endorsing mutual inclusion of the two provisions and cited a pending Supreme Court reference; consequence: parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal for merits if the higher court's ultimate ruling requires modification of this order.
Interplay between limitation for final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 was considered, and the tribunal applied binding precedent to treat limitation as governed by section 153 read with section 144C; consequence: the final assessment order for the stated year was held timebarred and quashed. The tribunal followed prior High Court and ITAT decisions endorsing mutual inclusion of the two provisions and cited a pending Supreme Court reference; consequence: parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal for merits if the higher court's ultimate ruling requires modification of this order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.