Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Validity of a final assessment under section 144C(13) hinges on the applicable limitation period, and the article explains that limitation must be determined by reading section 144C with section 153 together because both provisions overlap and are interdependent. Following precedent from a High Court and an ITAT decision, the note records that a final assessment for the specified year was treated as timebarred when limitation under section 153 read with section 144C was applied, resulting in quashing of the order, while parties retain liberty to revive the appeal pending the Supreme Court largerbench decision on the issue.
Validity of a final assessment under section 144C(13) hinges on the applicable limitation period, and the article explains that limitation must be determined by reading section 144C with section 153 together because both provisions overlap and are interdependent. Following precedent from a High Court and an ITAT decision, the note records that a final assessment for the specified year was treated as timebarred when limitation under section 153 read with section 144C was applied, resulting in quashing of the order, while parties retain liberty to revive the appeal pending the Supreme Court largerbench decision on the issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
