Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Validity of a final assessment under section 144C(13) hinges on the applicable limitation period, and the article explains that limitation must be determined by reading section 144C with section 153 together because both provisions overlap and are interdependent. Following precedent from a High Court and an ITAT decision, the note records that a final assessment for the specified year was treated as timebarred when limitation under section 153 read with section 144C was applied, resulting in quashing of the order, while parties retain liberty to revive the appeal pending the Supreme Court largerbench decision on the issue.
Validity of a final assessment under section 144C(13) hinges on the applicable limitation period, and the article explains that limitation must be determined by reading section 144C with section 153 together because both provisions overlap and are interdependent. Following precedent from a High Court and an ITAT decision, the note records that a final assessment for the specified year was treated as timebarred when limitation under section 153 read with section 144C was applied, resulting in quashing of the order, while parties retain liberty to revive the appeal pending the Supreme Court largerbench decision on the issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
