Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Reopening initiated in the individual's name but assessment subsequently framed on an association of persons was held impermissible; the tribunal found that changing the assessed status from individual to AOP during reassessment vitiates jurisdiction and procedure, rendering the reassessment order invalid. Consequently the reassessment order was quashed and the taxpayer's appeal allowed, on the basis that assessment must remain within the status named in the reopening notice and cannot be altered to substitute or create a different taxable status.
Reopening initiated in the individual's name but assessment subsequently framed on an association of persons was held impermissible; the tribunal found that changing the assessed status from individual to AOP during reassessment vitiates jurisdiction and procedure, rendering the reassessment order invalid. Consequently the reassessment order was quashed and the taxpayer's appeal allowed, on the basis that assessment must remain within the status named in the reopening notice and cannot be altered to substitute or create a different taxable status.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.