Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Reopening initiated in the individual's name but assessment subsequently framed on an association of persons was held impermissible; the tribunal found that changing the assessed status from individual to AOP during reassessment vitiates jurisdiction and procedure, rendering the reassessment order invalid. Consequently the reassessment order was quashed and the taxpayer's appeal allowed, on the basis that assessment must remain within the status named in the reopening notice and cannot be altered to substitute or create a different taxable status.
Reopening initiated in the individual's name but assessment subsequently framed on an association of persons was held impermissible; the tribunal found that changing the assessed status from individual to AOP during reassessment vitiates jurisdiction and procedure, rendering the reassessment order invalid. Consequently the reassessment order was quashed and the taxpayer's appeal allowed, on the basis that assessment must remain within the status named in the reopening notice and cannot be altered to substitute or create a different taxable status.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
