Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deductibility of expenditure for settlement of proceedings under...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds positions
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Deductibility of expenditure for settlement of proceedings under securities law: Tribunal applied CBDT Notification No.38/2025 to hold that settlement payments or penalties relating to contraventions under specified laws are not allowable as business expenditure under the Income Tax Act from AY 202526; however, because the assessment year before the Tribunal is AY 201718 the departmental proposition met no interference and the ground failed. Unexplained cash credits under the deeming provision: Tribunal found the lender's financials show genuine sharetrading revenue and no proximate connection to an entry operator, so the addition under unexplained cash credits was deleted; revenue's appeal dismissed.
Deductibility of expenditure for settlement of proceedings under securities law: Tribunal applied CBDT Notification No.38/2025 to hold that settlement payments or penalties relating to contraventions under specified laws are not allowable as business expenditure under the Income Tax Act from AY 202526; however, because the assessment year before the Tribunal is AY 201718 the departmental proposition met no interference and the ground failed. Unexplained cash credits under the deeming provision: Tribunal found the lender's financials show genuine sharetrading revenue and no proximate connection to an entry operator, so the addition under unexplained cash credits was deleted; revenue's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.