Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Charge of clandestine importation of gold engages the reverse burden of proof and presumption of illicit importation; the tribunal found failure to afford crossexamination under the prescribed procedure, a curable natural justice defect. The matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for de novo proceedings requiring compliance with the crossexamination process, permitting the appellant to argue merits orally and in writing, and directing completion within ninety days. All contentions remain open and admissibility of relied statements must be determined afresh.
Charge of clandestine importation of gold engages the reverse burden of proof and presumption of illicit importation; the tribunal found failure to afford crossexamination under the prescribed procedure, a curable natural justice defect. The matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for de novo proceedings requiring compliance with the crossexamination process, permitting the appellant to argue merits orally and in writing, and directing completion within ninety days. All contentions remain open and admissibility of relied statements must be determined afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.