Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportionality.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.