International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6841 to 6860 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportionality.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.