Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportionality.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Alleged contravention for routing crossborder diamond import payments outside authorised dealers and without prior RBI approval was examined; appellate tribunal applied proportionality and reduced penalty for one appellant to 50%--noting 14year delay and a prior 50% predeposit--while maintaining penalties for other appellants. The tribunal treated prior customs findings and comparable earlier matter as relevant context but decided relief based on delay, settlement history, and proportionality, thereby exercising appellate discretion to mitigate recoverable penalty for the named appellant but disposing appeals otherwise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
