Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High Court applied Section 44(1)(c) of the PML Act as an enabling provision allowing the authority who filed the PML complaint to seek committal of cognizable scheduled offences to the PML Act Special Court, but held that this does not extinguish the right of other aggrieved persons, including the accused, to invoke BNSS transfer provisions. The court recognised that joint trial of scheduled offences and PML Act offences is impossible, yet authorised transfer under BNSS Section 447 directly to the High Court and permitted consolidation by the same Special Court judge; transfer petition was allowed.
High Court applied Section 44(1)(c) of the PML Act as an enabling provision allowing the authority who filed the PML complaint to seek committal of cognizable scheduled offences to the PML Act Special Court, but held that this does not extinguish the right of other aggrieved persons, including the accused, to invoke BNSS transfer provisions. The court recognised that joint trial of scheduled offences and PML Act offences is impossible, yet authorised transfer under BNSS Section 447 directly to the High Court and permitted consolidation by the same Special Court judge; transfer petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
