Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Allegations that an agreement containing an arbitration clause is forged or fabricated defeat arbitrability because arbitration requires valid consent; where interim proceedings produced prima facie findings casting grave doubt on the document's authenticity, those findings are a relevant consideration and arbitration referral is inappropriate. Concurrent trial and firstinstance findings that originals were not produced and that fraud allegations were serious support nonarbitrability, and supervisory review must not reappreciate evidence to dislodge those findings. Appointment of an arbitrator when the arbitration agreement's existence is in serious dispute is premature and legally impermissible.
Allegations that an agreement containing an arbitration clause is forged or fabricated defeat arbitrability because arbitration requires valid consent; where interim proceedings produced prima facie findings casting grave doubt on the document's authenticity, those findings are a relevant consideration and arbitration referral is inappropriate. Concurrent trial and firstinstance findings that originals were not produced and that fraud allegations were serious support nonarbitrability, and supervisory review must not reappreciate evidence to dislodge those findings. Appointment of an arbitrator when the arbitration agreement's existence is in serious dispute is premature and legally impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.