Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments law and vicarious liability of a company officer were central: the managing director, being signatory and in charge of day-to-day affairs, issued cheques in partial discharge of debt and those cheques were dishonoured for insufficiency of funds, and statutory notice remained uncomplied with; on that basis the trial and appellate courts' findings that the offence under the Negotiable Instruments law was made out were upheld. The sentence as modified on appeal was found not to warrant interference and the revision challenging conviction and sentence was dismissed.
Dishonour of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments law and vicarious liability of a company officer were central: the managing director, being signatory and in charge of day-to-day affairs, issued cheques in partial discharge of debt and those cheques were dishonoured for insufficiency of funds, and statutory notice remained uncomplied with; on that basis the trial and appellate courts' findings that the offence under the Negotiable Instruments law was made out were upheld. The sentence as modified on appeal was found not to warrant interference and the revision challenging conviction and sentence was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.