Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Petitioner failed to produce the complete email extract confirming receipt of notices, creating a procedural irregularity that informed interim relief. The court required an interim deposit to secure the revenue interest because the effective promoter had left and the petitioner is represented by a senior citizen director; consequence is immediate: Rs. 25,00,000 must be deposited within 30 days by the petitioner (or her son as representative). Noncompliance permits respondents to treat the writ as dismissed and to take steps including extradition proceedings against the son. Writ petition disposed.
Petitioner failed to produce the complete email extract confirming receipt of notices, creating a procedural irregularity that informed interim relief. The court required an interim deposit to secure the revenue interest because the effective promoter had left and the petitioner is represented by a senior citizen director; consequence is immediate: Rs. 25,00,000 must be deposited within 30 days by the petitioner (or her son as representative). Noncompliance permits respondents to treat the writ as dismissed and to take steps including extradition proceedings against the son. Writ petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.