Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of charitable exemption under section 11 due to delayed filing of Form 10BB was held impermissible where the assessee was otherwise entitled to the benefit; procedural lapse alone should not defeat statutory exemption, and the tax department must not retain amounts not legitimately due. The court relied on precedent that revenue cannot collect tax not payable and treated the medical condition of the managing trustee as an explanatory circumstance for delay. Consequently the petitioner's entitlement to exemption was recognised while the court directed payment of Rs. 50,000 as a condition of relief.
Denial of charitable exemption under section 11 due to delayed filing of Form 10BB was held impermissible where the assessee was otherwise entitled to the benefit; procedural lapse alone should not defeat statutory exemption, and the tax department must not retain amounts not legitimately due. The court relied on precedent that revenue cannot collect tax not payable and treated the medical condition of the managing trustee as an explanatory circumstance for delay. Consequently the petitioner's entitlement to exemption was recognised while the court directed payment of Rs. 50,000 as a condition of relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.