Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be assessed in light of the interplay between section 144C and section 153: the tribunal applied preceding decisions holding the two provisions to be mutually inclusive and overlapping, so the limitation period for a 144C(13) assessment is to be governed with reference to section 153 read with section 144C. Applying that principle, the impugned final assessment under section 143(3) read with 144C(13) was held timebarred and quashed. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the pending Supreme Court larger bench decision requires modification.
Limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be assessed in light of the interplay between section 144C and section 153: the tribunal applied preceding decisions holding the two provisions to be mutually inclusive and overlapping, so the limitation period for a 144C(13) assessment is to be governed with reference to section 153 read with section 144C. Applying that principle, the impugned final assessment under section 143(3) read with 144C(13) was held timebarred and quashed. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the pending Supreme Court larger bench decision requires modification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.