Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be assessed in light of the interplay between section 144C and section 153: the tribunal applied preceding decisions holding the two provisions to be mutually inclusive and overlapping, so the limitation period for a 144C(13) assessment is to be governed with reference to section 153 read with section 144C. Applying that principle, the impugned final assessment under section 143(3) read with 144C(13) was held timebarred and quashed. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the pending Supreme Court larger bench decision requires modification.
Limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be assessed in light of the interplay between section 144C and section 153: the tribunal applied preceding decisions holding the two provisions to be mutually inclusive and overlapping, so the limitation period for a 144C(13) assessment is to be governed with reference to section 153 read with section 144C. Applying that principle, the impugned final assessment under section 143(3) read with 144C(13) was held timebarred and quashed. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the pending Supreme Court larger bench decision requires modification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
