Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
A joint development agreement alone does not trigger a transfer for capital gains purposes where possession is handed to the developer only for carrying out development and no consideration has been received or accrued to the landowner. The tribunal applied prior appellate and high court authorities to conclude that in the absence of consideration or possession transferred in the manner required to create equitable title, there is no accrual of capital gains in the year of the JDA; accordingly, no taxable capital gains arose for the year under consideration and the appeal was decided for the assessee.
A joint development agreement alone does not trigger a transfer for capital gains purposes where possession is handed to the developer only for carrying out development and no consideration has been received or accrued to the landowner. The tribunal applied prior appellate and high court authorities to conclude that in the absence of consideration or possession transferred in the manner required to create equitable title, there is no accrual of capital gains in the year of the JDA; accordingly, no taxable capital gains arose for the year under consideration and the appeal was decided for the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
