Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
A joint development agreement alone does not trigger a transfer for capital gains purposes where possession is handed to the developer only for carrying out development and no consideration has been received or accrued to the landowner. The tribunal applied prior appellate and high court authorities to conclude that in the absence of consideration or possession transferred in the manner required to create equitable title, there is no accrual of capital gains in the year of the JDA; accordingly, no taxable capital gains arose for the year under consideration and the appeal was decided for the assessee.
A joint development agreement alone does not trigger a transfer for capital gains purposes where possession is handed to the developer only for carrying out development and no consideration has been received or accrued to the landowner. The tribunal applied prior appellate and high court authorities to conclude that in the absence of consideration or possession transferred in the manner required to create equitable title, there is no accrual of capital gains in the year of the JDA; accordingly, no taxable capital gains arose for the year under consideration and the appeal was decided for the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
