Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) requires the revenue to specify which limb--concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars--is alleged; mere recital of the provision in the notice is inadequate. The tribunal held that notices failing to aver the specific material ingredients of the penal charge are defective and will vitiate penal proceedings, because penalty liability is distinct from tax assessment and carries serious civil consequences. The authorities must be clear at the time of issuing the notice which offence under the provision is charged; failure to do so invalidates the penalty process, consistent with cited authority.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) requires the revenue to specify which limb--concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars--is alleged; mere recital of the provision in the notice is inadequate. The tribunal held that notices failing to aver the specific material ingredients of the penal charge are defective and will vitiate penal proceedings, because penalty liability is distinct from tax assessment and carries serious civil consequences. The authorities must be clear at the time of issuing the notice which offence under the provision is charged; failure to do so invalidates the penalty process, consistent with cited authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.