Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision proceedings under section 263 were held impermissible because the Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries and took a plausible view in restricting a deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d) to profits from credit facilities to members. The AO verified accounts, investments and supporting details and disallowed the portion of the claim after application of mind; the superior officer's disagreement alone did not satisfy the twin conditions required to invoke revision u/s 263. Result: revision power not exercisable and the AO's assessment view is sustained in favour of the assessee.
Revision proceedings under section 263 were held impermissible because the Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries and took a plausible view in restricting a deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d) to profits from credit facilities to members. The AO verified accounts, investments and supporting details and disallowed the portion of the claim after application of mind; the superior officer's disagreement alone did not satisfy the twin conditions required to invoke revision u/s 263. Result: revision power not exercisable and the AO's assessment view is sustained in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
