Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
To establish fraudulent trading the tribunal must find transactions knowingly made with dishonest intent to defraud creditors, while wrongful trading targets directors or partners who knew or ought to have known insolvency was inevitable and failed to minimize creditor loss; the tribunal applied these distinct standards and found false entries and collusion between the corporate debtor and the counterparty, concluding receivables were wiped out without actual sales. Evidence met the civil standard of preponderance of probability on these facts, relevant earlier appellate and Supreme Court affirmations were noted, and the appeal was dismissed with the direction for contribution to the corporate debtor's assets.
To establish fraudulent trading the tribunal must find transactions knowingly made with dishonest intent to defraud creditors, while wrongful trading targets directors or partners who knew or ought to have known insolvency was inevitable and failed to minimize creditor loss; the tribunal applied these distinct standards and found false entries and collusion between the corporate debtor and the counterparty, concluding receivables were wiped out without actual sales. Evidence met the civil standard of preponderance of probability on these facts, relevant earlier appellate and Supreme Court affirmations were noted, and the appeal was dismissed with the direction for contribution to the corporate debtor's assets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.