Writ jurisdiction is limited to testing whether allegations...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findings
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Writ jurisdiction is limited to testing whether allegations disclose a cognizable offence; merits and evidentiary value of investigation materials are not to be gone into unless allegations on their face do not constitute a cognizable offence, disclose a purely civil dispute, or show manifest mala fide, in which case relief may follow. The definition and scope of money-laundering require prima facie involvement with proceeds of crime and extend to every mode of dealing with such proceeds; accordingly, allegations of diverted investments, preferentially priced ESOPs and related transactions can attract the offence. Petitioners' challenges to ECIR/FIR were dismissed for want of merit and abundance of incriminating material.
Writ jurisdiction is limited to testing whether allegations disclose a cognizable offence; merits and evidentiary value of investigation materials are not to be gone into unless allegations on their face do not constitute a cognizable offence, disclose a purely civil dispute, or show manifest mala fide, in which case relief may follow. The definition and scope of money-laundering require prima facie involvement with proceeds of crime and extend to every mode of dealing with such proceeds; accordingly, allegations of diverted investments, preferentially priced ESOPs and related transactions can attract the offence. Petitioners' challenges to ECIR/FIR were dismissed for want of merit and abundance of incriminating material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
