Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
