Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4141 to 4160 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
