Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Service of notices uploaded solely on the statutory GST electronic portal and denial of personal hearing were challenged as breaches of the principles of natural justice; the court noted personal hearing obligations and adequacy of electronic service are central. The court emphasised that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary and ordinarily inappropriate where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; because the appellate remedy under the GST framework was available and adequate, the petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to pursue the prescribed statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
