Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.