Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.