Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Section 107(4) CGST permits the appellate authority a discretionary additional one-month extension where an appellant is prevented by "sufficient cause" from filing within 90 days; that discretion ends with that 30-day window and cannot be expanded under Article 226. The court emphasises taxpayers' duty to monitor the GSTIN portal and rejects explanations of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge as insufficient to excuse delay. The court refused to entertain a belated challenge to a show-cause notice after an appeal was dismissed for delay and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.