Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Reopening of assessment on allegation of bogus invoices was held unjustified because ledger entries did not show escaped income and the AO treated Rs.3,67,43,973 as bogus purchase despite it being claimed as a deduction and linked to a later payment of Rs.5,13,02,342 following a DGGI survey. The petitioner was not called upon to explain the alleged bogus GST claim, and the High Court found procedural and substantive defects in the reassessment action. Consequently the notice under reopening and the impugned order were quashed and the writ petition allowed.
Reopening of assessment on allegation of bogus invoices was held unjustified because ledger entries did not show escaped income and the AO treated Rs.3,67,43,973 as bogus purchase despite it being claimed as a deduction and linked to a later payment of Rs.5,13,02,342 following a DGGI survey. The petitioner was not called upon to explain the alleged bogus GST claim, and the High Court found procedural and substantive defects in the reassessment action. Consequently the notice under reopening and the impugned order were quashed and the writ petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
