Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6381 to 6400 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the...
Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents found.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the earlier search of 27.02.2020 was held to be abated and materials seized in the first search cannot be treated as incriminating for the second search; consequence: those first-search materials cannot be relied on to initiate or complete proceedings under the later search-based assessment provision, and may only support a reopening under general reassessment provisions. The assessing officer may proceed under the search-based provision only on incriminating material actually found in the second search (loose papers) and may frame assessment for the search year on that basis; using first-search material in the second-search proceedings was ruled impermissible and the 153A-based assessment for the year under consideration was held bad in law.
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the earlier search of 27.02.2020 was held to be abated and materials seized in the first search cannot be treated as incriminating for the second search; consequence: those first-search materials cannot be relied on to initiate or complete proceedings under the later search-based assessment provision, and may only support a reopening under general reassessment provisions. The assessing officer may proceed under the search-based provision only on incriminating material actually found in the second search (loose papers) and may frame assessment for the search year on that basis; using first-search material in the second-search proceedings was ruled impermissible and the 153A-based assessment for the year under consideration was held bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
