Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the...
Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents found.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the earlier search of 27.02.2020 was held to be abated and materials seized in the first search cannot be treated as incriminating for the second search; consequence: those first-search materials cannot be relied on to initiate or complete proceedings under the later search-based assessment provision, and may only support a reopening under general reassessment provisions. The assessing officer may proceed under the search-based provision only on incriminating material actually found in the second search (loose papers) and may frame assessment for the search year on that basis; using first-search material in the second-search proceedings was ruled impermissible and the 153A-based assessment for the year under consideration was held bad in law.
Where a second warranted search was executed on 21.11.2020, the earlier search of 27.02.2020 was held to be abated and materials seized in the first search cannot be treated as incriminating for the second search; consequence: those first-search materials cannot be relied on to initiate or complete proceedings under the later search-based assessment provision, and may only support a reopening under general reassessment provisions. The assessing officer may proceed under the search-based provision only on incriminating material actually found in the second search (loose papers) and may frame assessment for the search year on that basis; using first-search material in the second-search proceedings was ruled impermissible and the 153A-based assessment for the year under consideration was held bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
