Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Determination of the limitation period for passing final transfer-pricing assessment under section 144C(13) was contested with respect to its interplay with section 153. The tribunal noted higher-court precedent holding the two provisions are interdependent and limitation must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; applying that approach, the tribunal found final assessment orders were passed beyond the applicable limitation period and therefore lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned final assessment orders were quashed for being time-barred.
Determination of the limitation period for passing final transfer-pricing assessment under section 144C(13) was contested with respect to its interplay with section 153. The tribunal noted higher-court precedent holding the two provisions are interdependent and limitation must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; applying that approach, the tribunal found final assessment orders were passed beyond the applicable limitation period and therefore lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned final assessment orders were quashed for being time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
