Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
When an assessee files additional evidence under the remand...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates remand.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
When an assessee files additional evidence under the remand rules, the appellate authority must seek and await a meaningful remand report from the assessing officer; merely sending portal reminders and then admitting and deciding on that evidence without the AO's views violates natural justice and undermines proper best-judgment assessments. The appellate authority's routine, non-specific requisitioning is inadequate; a clear, detailed letter and sufficient time are required to enable effective examination and comment. Result: the impugned appellate order deleting additions was set aside and the matter remanded for a fresh remand report with an opportunity of about four months to the AO.
When an assessee files additional evidence under the remand rules, the appellate authority must seek and await a meaningful remand report from the assessing officer; merely sending portal reminders and then admitting and deciding on that evidence without the AO's views violates natural justice and undermines proper best-judgment assessments. The appellate authority's routine, non-specific requisitioning is inadequate; a clear, detailed letter and sufficient time are required to enable effective examination and comment. Result: the impugned appellate order deleting additions was set aside and the matter remanded for a fresh remand report with an opportunity of about four months to the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.