Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Search warrant substantially complied with statutory requirements despite listing bank account before assessee name; search validity sustained and grounds challenging panchnama dismissed. Assessment for the year of search was correctly framed under the ordinary assessment provision while assessments for the six preceding years fall under special post-search assessment procedure, so framing under the ordinary provision for the search year is upheld. Additions based solely on a definition provision were reversed because a charging provision is required to create tax liability; the appellate authority's recharacterisation as business income was rejected since no factual or commercial basis established that the taxpayer carried on such business.
Search warrant substantially complied with statutory requirements despite listing bank account before assessee name; search validity sustained and grounds challenging panchnama dismissed. Assessment for the year of search was correctly framed under the ordinary assessment provision while assessments for the six preceding years fall under special post-search assessment procedure, so framing under the ordinary provision for the search year is upheld. Additions based solely on a definition provision were reversed because a charging provision is required to create tax liability; the appellate authority's recharacterisation as business income was rejected since no factual or commercial basis established that the taxpayer carried on such business.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.