Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of export procedure by mis-declaring diamond make under customs and SEZ rules was found; confiscation and penalty measures including penalty under the relevant provision were upheld as proportionate and lawful. The High Court found no jurisdictional error, no breach of principles of natural justice, and no statutory infirmity in the impugned order, and therefore dismissed the writ petition on merits. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal under the customs appeal rules, but monetary inability to prosecute an appeal was held immaterial to statutory appellate rights.
Violation of export procedure by mis-declaring diamond make under customs and SEZ rules was found; confiscation and penalty measures including penalty under the relevant provision were upheld as proportionate and lawful. The High Court found no jurisdictional error, no breach of principles of natural justice, and no statutory infirmity in the impugned order, and therefore dismissed the writ petition on merits. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal under the customs appeal rules, but monetary inability to prosecute an appeal was held immaterial to statutory appellate rights.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.