Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Adjudicating Authority correctly limited its inquiry to whether default had occurred and found the corporate debtor liable for repayment, thereby admitting the insolvency petition. The tribunal held that persistent refusal to permit stock and book audit and failure to cooperate with creditor-led restructuring efforts demonstrated deliberate non-cooperation; belated consent after takeover by the resolution professional did not excuse prior obstruction, and could not defeat admission. Because the authority considered the material particulars of debt, default date, and conduct relevant to restructuring, initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Adjudicating Authority correctly limited its inquiry to whether default had occurred and found the corporate debtor liable for repayment, thereby admitting the insolvency petition. The tribunal held that persistent refusal to permit stock and book audit and failure to cooperate with creditor-led restructuring efforts demonstrated deliberate non-cooperation; belated consent after takeover by the resolution professional did not excuse prior obstruction, and could not defeat admission. Because the authority considered the material particulars of debt, default date, and conduct relevant to restructuring, initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
