Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Adjudicatory authority rejected claimed interest as an inadmissible component of financial debt where interest at 24% p.a. compounded monthly was unsupported by bona fide documentation. Related-party advances lacked board resolutions, were not registered as a charge with RoC, and interest was not reflected in the corporate debtor's books; repayment terms were unset. The tribunal accepted these factual and accounting defects and upheld disallowance of the disputed interest, dismissing the appeal and affirming the liquidator's position.
Adjudicatory authority rejected claimed interest as an inadmissible component of financial debt where interest at 24% p.a. compounded monthly was unsupported by bona fide documentation. Related-party advances lacked board resolutions, were not registered as a charge with RoC, and interest was not reflected in the corporate debtor's books; repayment terms were unset. The tribunal accepted these factual and accounting defects and upheld disallowance of the disputed interest, dismissing the appeal and affirming the liquidator's position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.