Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
A pre-existing operational debt dispute over damaged and unreturned shuttering and scaffolding material, and pending reconciliation, was held to bar initiation of insolvency proceedings. Applying Mobilox principles, the tribunal found the debtor's defence-failure to replace or value damaged goods and requests for collection and valuation-plausible and supported by contemporaneous correspondence predating the demand notice; therefore the invoices remained disputed and not admitted. The adjudicating authority was correct to reject the insolvency petition without adjudicating the merits of the defence, and the appeal against that rejection was dismissed.
A pre-existing operational debt dispute over damaged and unreturned shuttering and scaffolding material, and pending reconciliation, was held to bar initiation of insolvency proceedings. Applying Mobilox principles, the tribunal found the debtor's defence-failure to replace or value damaged goods and requests for collection and valuation-plausible and supported by contemporaneous correspondence predating the demand notice; therefore the invoices remained disputed and not admitted. The adjudicating authority was correct to reject the insolvency petition without adjudicating the merits of the defence, and the appeal against that rejection was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
