Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
The High Court found the Tribunals Delhi Bench erred in dismissing multiple appeals for alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction instead of seeking transfer orders from the Tribunal President; the HC held that the Delhi Bench should have referred the matters for transfer and that summary dismissal imposed undue burdens on parties. The HC set aside the impugned dismissals, restored the appeals to the original Delhi Bench dockets for merits adjudication, and directed that any corresponding matters pending before the Lucknow Bench remain deferred until Delhi disposes them; Lucknow must close duplicate appeals after production of Delhis disposal orders.
The High Court found the Tribunals Delhi Bench erred in dismissing multiple appeals for alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction instead of seeking transfer orders from the Tribunal President; the HC held that the Delhi Bench should have referred the matters for transfer and that summary dismissal imposed undue burdens on parties. The HC set aside the impugned dismissals, restored the appeals to the original Delhi Bench dockets for merits adjudication, and directed that any corresponding matters pending before the Lucknow Bench remain deferred until Delhi disposes them; Lucknow must close duplicate appeals after production of Delhis disposal orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
