Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Assessing Officer's reference to the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C was invalid where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no variation following a section 92CA request. The tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that an 'eligible assessee' status under section 144C is absent absent any proposed TPO variation, and therefore the AO wrongly invoked the DRP reference. Consequence: the assessment order was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Assessing Officer's reference to the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C was invalid where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no variation following a section 92CA request. The tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that an 'eligible assessee' status under section 144C is absent absent any proposed TPO variation, and therefore the AO wrongly invoked the DRP reference. Consequence: the assessment order was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
