Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Assessing Officer's reference to the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C was invalid where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no variation following a section 92CA request. The tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that an 'eligible assessee' status under section 144C is absent absent any proposed TPO variation, and therefore the AO wrongly invoked the DRP reference. Consequence: the assessment order was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Assessing Officer's reference to the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C was invalid where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no variation following a section 92CA request. The tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that an 'eligible assessee' status under section 144C is absent absent any proposed TPO variation, and therefore the AO wrongly invoked the DRP reference. Consequence: the assessment order was quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
