Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The dispute concerns de-bonding of a 100% Export Oriented Unit and application of Condition 10 of the Standard Conditions to determine final date of exit; the suo-motu de-bonding order dated 08.08.2006 was clarified as the final exit date and that factual finding must be considered. The appellate authority is obligated to conduct a de-novo enquiry and apply independent judicial mind rather than mechanically affirm prior findings; previous orders that refused fresh consideration and which the tribunal dismissed without reasons are unsustainable. The matter is remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh, reasoned adjudication in accordance with law.
The dispute concerns de-bonding of a 100% Export Oriented Unit and application of Condition 10 of the Standard Conditions to determine final date of exit; the suo-motu de-bonding order dated 08.08.2006 was clarified as the final exit date and that factual finding must be considered. The appellate authority is obligated to conduct a de-novo enquiry and apply independent judicial mind rather than mechanically affirm prior findings; previous orders that refused fresh consideration and which the tribunal dismissed without reasons are unsustainable. The matter is remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh, reasoned adjudication in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
