Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.