Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
