Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Sub-section (8) of Section 112 requires payment of an additional 20% of the disputed tax alongside the deposit required under sub-section (6) of Section 107, and no such appellate deposit was made in the matter arising from the confiscation order. The interim direction was modified to require deposit of Rs.2,00,000 before the Adjudicating Authority, upon which the vehicle must be released within one week; other conditions of the Single Judge shall remain operative until disposal of the writ petition. The contempt petition alleging disobedience was held misconceived due to non-execution of the indemnity bond and is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.